| 416.822.1239 in Toronto | 905.415.1636 in Markham | 905.660.9912 in Vaughan | 289.316.0551 in Durham Region
In the Fort Frances, Ontario, family law case of Lambert v. Lambert, Dennis Lambert and Judy Calder Lambert entered into a marriage agreement prior to their August 1995 marriage. The couple separated in July 2004.
The Lambert marriage agreement of 1995 indicated that, in the event the couple separated for longer than 90 days, the property they owned together would be split with the exception of the personal property owned by each as listed in Schedules A and B of their marriage agreements. Judy Calder Lambert only listed a 1991 Honda and general household furnishings in her Schedule and claimed she didn't know Dennis Lambert would be listing expensive mortgages, investments, heavy machinery, four vehicles and two boats.
Judy Calder Lambert claimed she never reviewed her husband's Schedule regarding personal property and therefore did not list her own items of similar worth. She claims the schedules should be ignored, and all the couple's property should be split. The Court ruled that, Mr. Lambert failed to properly disclose his financial circumstances and that Ms Lambert's failure to obtain independent legal advice were sufficient grounds to set aside the marriage contract.
Marriage agreements usually outline specific arrangements of marriages. These documents outline what pieces of property, mortgages, cars, businesses and investments each party owns prior to a marriage. During marriages, property, investments, income and belongings are shared. However, marriage agreements are used to keep separate property from the other party in case of a separation.

Quinn Divorce Case
In the divorce proceedings of Quinn v. Epstein Cole, Lynda Quinn wanted to revisit the issue of her former husband's financial records even though she had previously waived her claim to seek spousal support. The justice in the case had ruled that because she had waived her right to such support, it was truly unnecessary to revisit the records.
[Read More]
We welcome any feedback or topics for discussion for the Letters to the Editor section.
[Read more.]