| 416.822.1239 in Toronto | 905.415.1636 in Markham | 905.660.9912 in Vaughan | 289.316.0551 in Durham Region
Spousal support consists of a payment or payments made from one spouse to the other following the breakdown of a marriage or other cohabiting relationship. Spousal support is governed by the Divorce Act in instances where the couple was previously married and by the Family Law Act if the couples were cohabiting but not married. The purpose of this support is to ensure that the recipient spouse continues to enjoy the wealth accrued by the other spouse during the duration of the marriage or cohabitation.
Support payments are typically made in the form of monthly payments, but may also be made in any of the following manners:
If there are children of the marriage or relationship, child support takes precedence over spousal support, to ensure that the parents continue to provide for their children. Provided that a parent is able to pay both child support and spousal support, the factors to be considered in determining whether spousal support should be paid include:
Marital misconduct is not considered a factor in determining whether a spouse is entitled to support. Unlike child support, spousal support may be deducted on the payor's income tax return and it is considered taxable income to the recipient spouse.
The Divorce Act currently only provides support to married spouses and does not cover common law marriages where the spouses were cohabiting, but not formally married. The purposes of providing spousal support under the Divorce Act include:
The Department of Justice released federal spousal support guidelines that may be used in determining the amount of spousal support in divorces regulated by the Divorce Act . Unlike the Child Support Guidelines, these guidelines are not mandatory. However, they are often used by courts in determining the amount and duration of spousal support payments. These factors include:
Unlike the Divorce Act, the Family Law Act defines a spouse as one who has been married or who has cohabited continuously for three years or more in a permanent relationship where there is a child involved. The child may either be the natural child of the parents or an adopted child. This definition applies to both heterosexual relationships and same-sex partners. The purpose of spousal support under the Family Law Act is for one partner to provide support to the other partner in accordance with need, if he or she is capable of doing so.
Factors that courts consider in determining the amount and duration of child support under the Family Law Act include:
Spousal support is often modified or terminated following the breakdown of a relationship for various reasons. Support can be modified if there is a change in circumstances following the initial support order. The burden of demonstrating a change in circumstances is on the spouse applying for the modification.
Support can be terminated in any of the following circumstances:
Spousal support is often set to end at a particular date in order to encourage the dependent spouse to become self-supportive. Courts are prevented from extending spousal support payments past this specified date, unless there has been a change in circumstances that resulted in economic hardship to the dependent spouse.
Not all spousal support arrangements include an end date, however. In instances where the dependent spouse has provided a great deal of child care, domestic services, and other assistance to the other spouse in his or her career, an indefinite spousal support order is often granted.
If the support spouse dies, support payments typically terminate. However, if the support order specifically states that the support is binding on the supporting spouse's estate, the dependent spouse can receive additional support from the supporting spouse's estate following death.
In the province of Ontario, if the spouses reconcile, the spousal support order is considered void. If, after the reconciliation, the spouses decide to separate again, they must enter into another spousal separation agreement.

Buxar Domestic Contract Case
In Buxar v. Lukich, Buxar filed a claim in Ontario Family Court that she should be the owner of her engagement ring after a failed relationship. Lukich counter-claimed that he should be returned the engagement ring he purchased for his former girlfriend, that Buxar should return to him his portion of the down payment the couple made on what was to be their matrimonial home in Michigan.
[Read More]
We welcome any feedback or topics for discussion for the Letters to the Editor section.
[Read more.]